Health Passport – it is serious when messing with basic citizen rights!
Águas de Lindóia, June 12, 2021
Is the end of the freedom to come and go with the “health passport”? What does the project that advances in the Congress say
Certificate of Immunization and Health Security (CSS) is a kind of “health passport
No experimental immunizers guarantee immunity, do the immunity test through blood sample, around four to five months after you take the vaccine and you will know the truth.
In Brazil and in the world, thousands of people lost their lives due to vaccine side effects – in Brazil, this information is hidden from the population.
Understand better the content of this so-called health passport:
The Senate approved, on June 10, the bill that establishes the Certificate of Immunization and Health Security (CSS) – a kind of “health passport” or “vaccine passport” that, in practice, will allow the movement exclusively of people immunized or who tested negative for Covid-19 or other infectious diseases in public or private environments that implement access restrictions during the pandemic. And it forbids other people to access these environments, trampling on the Constitution, their right to come and go, their individual rights, using once again, the light of the law against the population – who still have doubts about the efficacy and safety of such experimental vaccines.
For those who do not know, the decrees, the shutdowns, the psychological and physical pressure against citizens began in early March 2020, when the Chinese Ambassador visited several politicians and authorities in Brazil. (Something never seen before in the country).
The proposal, authored by Senator Carlos Portinho (PL-RJ), with a substitute text prepared by Senator Veneziano Vital do Rêgo (MDB-PB), was approved by 72 votes in favor and none against; eight parliamentarians did not attend the session. The text will now be voted on in the Chamber of Deputies. A creation against the population must be faced by good people, whose we know that the Covid19, has its indications that it is a great fraud, by decrees created to increase the amount of contaminated people in the world. In my opinion, respecting the proposal of the above-mentioned Senators, I do not agree. And I think that every project, proposals that are against the population, we Brazilians should unite, not voting more in these politicians who are against the people.
“Vaccination passports” hurt individual rights and does not guarantee any collective protection, as some defend to justify the dictatorship imposed in Brazil and also in the world.
Vaccination x individual freedom:
I am not against the vaccine, however, being experimental, it brings great doubts in all aspects .
What the bill that institutes the Health Certificate says
According to the author of the proposal, the CSS will be implemented through a digital platform made available at no cost to residents in Brazil and will allow the issuance of four documents:
National Vaccination Certificate (CNV): an existing standard document that proves vaccination against various diseases and is required for entry into some countries.
Certificate of International Vaccination and Testing (CVIT): document that proves that the person has received the required vaccinations for departure to destinations that require them.
Certificate of Testing (CT): statement that certifies that the citizen has recently had a test to detect infectious disease causing an outbreak or pandemic.
Certificate of Recovery from Infectious Disease (CRDI): record that informs that its holder has recovered from an infectious disease.
See how they unite, when it is to vote something against the Brazilian population.
In the projects for Education, Health, Public Safety, fighting poverty, severe laws against organized crime, against corruption, against the privileges of politicians and authorities, of job opportunities, of the increase in salaries for policemen, doctors, nurses, on environmental protection and other classes – not one project appears that is approved? – Why is that?
Returning to the subject…
If this bill is also approved in the House of Representatives and then sanctioned by Jair Bolsonaro, the “health passport” will be used to authorize entry to public places and events, the use of public transportation, and entry into shops, hotels, parks, nature reserves, among others. According to the author of the proposal, the measure will also be used for states and municipalities to suspend or relax restrictions on the movement of people or access to public and private places due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
In other words, a great dictatorship – they want to force you to be an obedient citizen through domination!
And for this, they promise to guarantee not only the population’s right of movement, but also to diminish the harmful effects of prolonged social isolation, as well as to maintain economic activities that could not adapt to remote systems for the supply of services and products,” says one of the senators, Carlos Portinho, in the project’s justification.
If we had the right health education, we wouldn’t need lockdowns (closure or restrictions) and much less use a mask, which is also advised against by many health experts.
See as an example, the center of São Paulo, which restricted through severe measures a part of the population, while, subway, train and bus stations, worked normally and always crowded of people. In part, this gave them the opportunity to break many companies, frighteningly increasing the number of unemployed. And it is the place that also killed more people, victims of the coronavirus (or of various diseases that were wrongly attributed to Covid19).
Currently, there are a little more than 19 million people already recovering from the disease in the country, and the number of active cases is small. These data show that the vast majority of the Brazilian population is not infected with the coronavirus, and is fully able to resume its normal activities.
According to the approved text, the establishments that wish to impose access restriction to people who do not have the CSS should present the following information at the entrance of the place: “Admission to this location is conditioned to the presentation of the Immunization and Sanitary Security Certificate (PSS)”; the establishments will be responsible for access control.
The text cited above by the project is one of the greatest barbarities practiced worldwide by imposition and international pressure here in Brazil.
It even seems, indications that the vaccine has become a big business.
Measure is seen with caution by jurists
The creation of a document capable of prohibiting the circulation, in certain places, of the portion of the population that was not vaccinated against Covid-19 is subject to reservations by analysts.
The implementation of the measure outside a concrete context of restriction of fundamental rights, as is the case of the state of siege, is abusive. “If you determine that a public space is closed for health reasons and, therefore, no one will be allowed access, that’s fine. But granting access only to those who have taken two doses of the vaccines is discriminatory and is pressuring the individual to have to use something experimental, where there is no guarantee of efficacy and especially safety – we must emphasize that thousands of deaths have occurred with side effects, and ignored by Brazilian authorities and politicians – here is the question, who will be responsible for the side effects? Who will answer criminally or pay the costs of a citizen who is affected by this vaccine?
There are some who say that side effects are rare, yet they kill and leave people with serious health problems! Perhaps, it is because it has not reached a member of their families . or here is a doubt, will be for them the vaccines, are different ?
Little by little the omens of 2018 and 2019 of Jucelino Luz will be confirmed , as to the terrible (dangerous) effects and the ineffectiveness of the experimental vaccines ,,,, Thus proving the crime against humanity – who will be judged for this ?
He explains that the purpose of the measure is not so positive, since it only seeks to avoid contamination (which is fair, but there are other means), also not charging laboratories with such responsibilities – Even more, the way it is being conducted is unconstitutional, since it restricts the right to come and go of part of the population. “The Federal Constitution, when addressing this right, does not cite this type of restriction as possible. The attempt to reduce risk is praiseworthy, but the method is legally inappropriate,” states Jucelino Luz
Jucelino Luz, points out that the measure becomes more abusive in the proportion that the State has not yet been able to make safe and effective vaccination available to the entire population (who are afraid and terrified, using them supposedly as guinea pigs). It is one thing to determine that to enter a public office you must wear a mask. That’s fine, because it is an affordable measure. Now, if you determine that only those who are vaccinated are allowed to enter, then the State needs to put safe, effective vaccines at the entrance of all public places, so that people can choose to take them”, he points out. If in the world we still don’t have solid guarantees of the vaccine’s effectiveness and safety, then we have the controversy of wanting to require it under penalty of restricting the entry of those who have not been vaccinated, and in turn, will not have the full right to come and go. Is this correct?”, he questions.
Since it would reduce excessively restrictive measures determined by the public authorities and give citizens more freedom to act freely in the economic and social context. He points out, however, that since the Covid-19 vaccines were developed on an emergency basis, it is not possible to compare it to the other mandatory vaccines in Brazil, which have a history of several years of monitoring, which allows to measure aspects such as the effectiveness of the immunization, as well as its adverse effects and contraindications.
The measure ends up obliging the citizen to be immunized, and the obligatory nature of the vaccination itself does exist, but this refers to vaccines with years of follow-up. As the vaccine against Covid-19 has this emergency character, forcing the population to be immunized removes the positive intent of the proposition”, says Jucelino Luz
As for the citizens who choose not to be immunized against Covid-19, I explain that, in case the bill is approved, they will need to go to court to guarantee their right to free movement. That at least here in Brazil, in a tumultuous moment and with so many legal injustices, the citizen can lose time in demanding their legal rights. That is, those who choose not to take the vaccine will have to ask for some judicial measure, a kind of “sanitary habeas corpus” that guarantees their right to come and go without taking the vaccine, he says.
It also explains that, according to the decision of the Supreme Court (STF), December 2020, which defined that states and municipalities can determine that vaccination is mandatory, one of the requirements set by the Court was that the immunizers had “ample information about the effectiveness, safety and contraindications. At the moment, we don’t have this, in any of the immunizers, and besides, this alone doesn’t guarantee the tranquility of the people who don’t trust and don’t believe in these vaccinations. I also point out that, due to the emergency nature of the Covid-19 vaccines, these requirements are not being observed in the bill in question. The measure, according to my research, would be indirectly “forcing” citizens to receive immunization, even without the requirements determined by the STF, in order not to lose fundamental rights.
There may be health control measures, but for this type of determination it is necessary to have more ample evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the vaccines,” says Jucelino Luz . Some of the immunizers against Covid-19 have shown – a good part of them, not to the point of not being able to be vaccinated – adverse reactions which made some countries disallow its application to certain ages and groups.
For Jucelino Luz, the institution of the “health passport” – especially when a predetermined period for its validity is not established – is serious, as it interferes with the citizen’s basic rights. The text basically says that freedom is no longer a rule, but a concession from the State. This is dangerous, because to the extent that this logic that freedom is a concession by the State is established, in the future, new requirements may be placed to maintain the permission of the right to locomotion. I think that this is a dictatorship (domination), that is, violence against the people.
Senators say that the Brazilian “health passport” is similar to initiatives in European countries – I don’t think we should copy anyone.
According to Senator Veneziano Vital do Rêgo, the CSS is inspired by a similar proposal from the European Union (EU), which instituted the Digital Green Certificate within the European territory, aiming to unify the rules adopted by several countries to reconcile the fight against the pandemic with the citizens’ right to free movement. Indications that it is, a great excuse to dominate people and perpetuate in their positions
What is being done in Brazil with this idea of restricting access, especially in public spaces, is something else. They took the original idea and made a mistaken analogy, and full of singular interests, says Jucelino Luz
Text about “sanitary passport” goes to the House of Representatives; Bolsonaro says he will veto it – thus, the Brazilian people, who voted for him, also expect this attitude of vetoing this dictatorial and domination project by some politicians and authorities that want and reproduce projects against the wishes of the people.
After the approval in the Senate, the text about the “health passport” will now be evaluated in the House of Representatives and, if approved, will be submitted to the presidential sanction or veto, however, Jair Bolsonaro told supporters that he will veto the “health passport” if it is approved by the congressmen. If this happens, Congress will still be able to overthrow the president’s veto and act, once again, against the legal rights of the Brazilian people.
Without generalizing and with rare exceptions, I have never seen a politician vote something in favor of the people in the last 55 years.
We are not against the vaccine and much less against those who have already vaccinated. Stop, think for a moment, about those who had side effects and today are no longer among us, or live in great difficulty because of the damage of the vaccine. “Imagine, if it were someone in your family…
Under allegation of strains, variants – by the class of scientists commanded by these politicians, they want to use new doses. If two doses did not work, do you really believe that the third, fourth or fifth dose will work? – Pure hypocrisy of these world rulers…
Observe, how much fear and panic, the sensationalist media has caused you, in your homes, showing and talking every day about Covid19 and the deaths. They gave you no option but the miracle of vaccination – don’t you find that very strange?
Pay attention to my words, just to clarify: – the virus exists, and it does kill, and if you feel safe from vaccination, then take it. However, the number of deaths by Covid19 , presented is only 40% of the total that was presented by world bodies and the remaining 60%, the death was by historical diseases already existing in the victims.
” Laws cannot give absolute power to anyone , nor get stuck between the parties involved , otherwise there is cooperativism , opportunity for organized crime to grow , and above all , injustice prevails . “
Finally , the population needs to unite , on election day ,do not vote anymore for those who are against you .
God bless you all!
Prof. Jucelino Nobrega da Luz – Researcher, influencer, activist and spiritual advisor
JucelinoLuz 